Short on Time
Omega has a proud history of horological innovation, from being the first to place a tourbillon within a wristwatch, to developing high-tech solutions, such as the Spirate system, that take accuracy to another level. And that’s not even mentioning the timekeeping inventions that Omega brought to the table as the official timekeeper of the Olympic Games. But there is another type of frontier toward which Omega has been leading the way, and that is one of design and ergonomics. These categories may be more subjective in nature, but they lay the groundwork for creating a strong identity. There is one collection that remains emblematic of both of these pillars of Omega’s history, and that is the discontinued but fondly remembered Dynamic.
First Generation: Genève/De Ville Dynamic
There are no shortage of interesting and unexpected designs to be discovered in Omega’s extensive back catalog, but few bring the level of intrigue that we find in the Dynamic. It should come as no surprise that the Dynamic was first launched in the late 1960s, an era marked by experimentation and a willingness to tread new ground, even for long-established brands such as Omega. The Dynamic was on the leading edge of this philosophy, and boasted an aesthetic and feature set that felt at once futuristic and very much of its era.

Photo: Christie's
After a few years of gestation, the first generation of the Dynamic hit the market in 1968, within the Genève family, featuring a design from Raymond Thévenaz. The idea behind the Dynamic was centered around ergonomics and design. The overall shape was meant to form around the natural shape of the arm and wrist, resulting in an oval-esque organic shape. It also featured a single-piece monocoque case that was able to be swapped between strap systems on the fly. This is a surprisingly modern feature that would flatter even today, and which created something of an ecosystem of accessories for the collection.

The Omega Dynamic was well-received through the early ‘70s, thanks to the unconventional design and clever marketing that highlighted the ergonomics of the design, as well as the dynamic flexibility offered by the strap-change system. The case was completely sealed, and servicing required the movement to be removed through the dial aperture, a move that necessitated a burst of air sent through the crown tube to pop the crystal off of the case. This meant a slightly more finicky process for servicing than merely taking a trip to the local watchmaker. This choice was unique to the first generation of the Dynamic.

Photo: Bonhams
From an aesthetic standpoint, the first generation of the Dynamic was the most adventurous. The elliptical case hosted a variety of colorful dial options, and the finishing details drew focus to the asymmetry of the case and dial relationship. Further, the nested crown was handled with particular care in reflecting the overall shape of the design. Finally, the chassis that housed the case itself made for a clean, lugless shape similar to that of a “disco volante”-style watch.

Photo: Bonhams
The first-generation Dynamic models used a wide variety of Omega calibers from the ‘60s and ‘70s, all providing more or less the same functionality: a simple three-handed time display with a date aperture at 3 o’clock. While most were automatic in nature, examples containing the hand winding Caliber 601 do pop up from time to time. By 1970, the Dynamic collection moved from the Genève family to the DeVille range, and welcomed new, more polished finishing methods.
Second Generation: Seamaster Dynamic
The Dynamic would remain in some form of production throughout much of the 1970s, though the looming Quartz Crisis would send many Omega collections back to the drawing board for reconsideration heading into the ‘80s. A new Dynamic emerged in 1984, this time sporting mostly quartz calibers. The short-lived second generation of the Dynamic was placed within the Seamaster collection, and was notable for its rather unusual case and integrated bracelet.

Photo: Lawsons Auctioneers
The case was designed with a large bezel piece that wrapped around the edges, complete with spider-like tendrils at each hour marker. It feels a bit like a prop of sorts, but the actual center portion of the dial does resonate with a more sensible design direction. The watch once again embraced the circle-within-a-circle idea, this time weighted to the top rather than the sides. Like many watches of the mid-1980s, this Dynamic had a strange design, and while they are a tough find these days thanks to their limited production run, they are something of a cult favorite.
The second generation of the Dynamic did not enjoy the same popularity as did the original. While it isn’t necessarily difficult to see why, it’s important to pause and appreciate the position that Omega found itself in during this period. The fact that we got this watch at all speaks to the new ground that Omega was attempting to claim, and the resulting somewhat risky designs are the result. For what it’s worth, I think it’s important for brands to take bigger swings on watches like this to better define their long-term DNA.
Third Generation: A New Look for the Nineties
This is not the end of the story for the Dynamic, however. In 1997, Omega introduced a new generation of the Dynamic. This one, however, would be in the form of a military-tribute design. A far cry from the modern and forward looking Dynamic collections of old. That spirit of defining the future was set aside to pursue one of looking back. This was on the precipice of the “throwback” trend gaining large-scale traction in the watch community, and in that sense, Omega was ahead of the curve with this watch.

Photo: Sotheby's
While the tone had shifted with the third generation of the Dynamic, a big personality was still on display. The designs were pilot-oriented military designs, and they weren’t exactly pure throwbacks, but they did manage to capture a vibe quite well. This allowed the watches to live in a unique space of originality while still being somewhat referential — frankly, a balance that many brands still struggle to achieve today.

Photo: Phillips
This final expression of the Dynamic launched with a three-handed time-and-date iteration, featuring expressive Arabic numerals printed on the dial. The design would also welcome a chronograph variation that would live underneath the Speedmaster within the Omega stable. The chronograph used the same style of numerals, and added a minute totalizer at the 9 o’clock position, across from the running seconds, forming a symmetrical design. This was housed within a 38mm steel case that housed Omega’s Caliber 1138, an ETA 2890-A2 movement with a Dubois-Depraz module. James Bond actor Pierce Brosnan, a freshly minted Omega ambassador at that point, owned one of these Dynamic chronographs, which sold at a charity auction a few years after its debut.
A Dynamic Future?
As interesting as the final iteration of the Dynamic was, it, too, was short-lived, disappearing from the catalog by 1999. It feels like a near impossible idea to return to, but it is exactly the kind of thinking that would benefit Omega today. A modern Dynamic could represent a new generation of forward-looking design, and a return to the optimism once felt around the industry. The safe decisions that mark many of today’s decisions lack the bite of something original, and the Dynamic represents the opportunity for Omega to define a new generation of enthusiasm around its long-established technical bona fides. Here’s hoping we see a return to the aptly named Dynamic collection sometime soon.




































Be the first to leave a comment
Log in or to leave a comment